|
|
|
Second Opinion In this forum for discussing the “hot button” issues facing the nursing profession today, we welcome your thoughts and opinions. Check this space in each issue to see how readers answer the provocative questions we pose. Our question this issue: The results: Our readers said: Actually, I think the DNP is a great opportunity, and
it should certainly be pursued and instituted. However, I do not think
that it should differ significantly from current PhD in Nursing curriculums
as they might end up devaluing one or the other.
Go with the PhD! Why put yet another branch on the nursing tree to resist cohesiveness? There aren’t enough educational resources and faculty now for nursing. Why open up another program when there already exists a program to meet the need of a doctorate in nursing? Nursing organizations are not supporting this—just the education
arena. Let’s let nurses control what is going on in nursing for
a change. No, DNP! Yes, PhD! I don’t believe that APNs should be required to obtain a Doctor
of Nursing Practice. It already takes four years for a BSN, two years
for a master’s, and another three to four years for a doctorate.
That is almost 10 years of schooling. People would rather be a pharmacist,
dentist, and go to medical school to save time and have greater financial
worth. This will limit males from entering the nursing profession and
discourage them from obtaining advanced degrees, as they would just go
to medical school instead.
Nursing is one of the last health professions to
recommend a clinical doctorate. I say it’s about time! Advanced
practice and specialty nurses are on a par with other health service
professions in terms of their training and professional development.
The DNP degree is appropriate and way past due.
|
|
|